CRL.M.C./2245/2011 of HUKAM SINGH & ORS. Vs STATE OF NC TOF DELHI & ORS.
Parties
- RAGHUBIRSINGH@ RAGGI & ORS.Through l^rJJain,Adv (PETITIONER)
- STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS (RESPONDENT)
Cites (0 resolved of 1 detected)
1 case citation detected in this judgment's own text, but none resolved to a judgment page in this build yet.
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
$~2*INTHEHIGHCOURTOFDELHIATNEWDELHI+CRLM.C.2244/2011
RAGHUBIRSINGH@ RAGGI & ORS.Through l^rJJain,Adv.
Petitioners
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.
Respondents
ThroughIMr.Ravi Shankar Garg, Adv. for R-2Mr.NavinSharma,APP
CRL.M.C.2245/2011
HUKAM SINGH& ORS.PetitionersThroughl^r. J.Jain,Adv.
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.RespondentsThroughl^lr.Ravi Shankar Garg, Adv. for R-2Mr.NavinSharma,APP
CORAM:HON'BLEMR. JUSTICEV.K. SHALI
ORDER- 05.08.2011 05.08.2011
%- 05.08.2011 05.08.20111.In terms of the order dated 20.7.2011,an amount of ?15,000/-in CrLlvi.C.No.2244/2011and ? 20,000/-in CrLIVI.C.No.2245/2011have been depositedin terms of the last order.2.Havingregardto the factsof the case that the partieshavesettledtheir disputesand that there were two cross cases thatwereregisteredagainsttheparties,I feel thatin thelargerinterestofpeaceandtranquility,boththeFIRsandthe
consequentchargesheetwhichispendingin theCourtoflearnedMM deserves to be quashed.In view of the aforesaidfacts,FIR no.403/2009,u/S 324/34IPCregisteredbyP.S.MangolPuriandFIRNo.406/2009,u/S323/341/506/34IPC registeredbyP.S.MangolPuriandtheconsequentchargesheetwhicharependingin theCourtoflearnedMM are quashed.
Parties to bear their costs.
V.K. SHALI^J
AUGUST05, 2011RN