CRL.A./993/2009 of PANKAJ CHAUDHARY Vs STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
Parties
- PANKAJ CHAUDHARY Through: Mr. Gopi Chand, Advocate with Appellant present in JC (PETITIONER)
- THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI Through (RESPONDENT)
Cites (2)
- AIR 2001 SC 2075 (2001) CONSIDERED
- MADAN GOPAL KAKKAD versus NAVAL DUBEY AND ANR. (1992)
Statutes cited (24)
- indian penal code, 511 (1860)
- indian penal code, 506 (1860)
- indian penal code, 354 (1860)
- indian penal code, 506 (1860)
- code of criminal procedure, 164 (1973)
- code of criminal procedure, 164 (1973)
- code of criminal procedure, 173 (1973)
- code of criminal procedure, 313 (1973)
- indian penal code, 511 (1860)
- indian penal code, 506 (1860)
- code of criminal procedure, 313 (1973)
- indian penal code, 354 (1860)
- code of criminal procedure, 164 (1973)
- code of criminal procedure, 164 (1973)
- indian penal code, 375 (1860)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CRL. A. 993/2009
Date of Hearing: 11[th] August, 2011
Date of Decision: 17[th] August, 2011
PANKAJ CHAUDHARY Through: Mr. Gopi Chand, Advocate with Appellant present in JC.
...APPELLANT
Versus
THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI Through:
...RESPONDENT
Mr. Saleem Ahmed, ASC for the State.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL
1. Whether reporters of local papers may be
allowed to see the Order?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether the Order should be reported
in the Digest?
No No No
J U M N T
G.P. MITTAL, J.
1.The present appeal is partly allowed in terms of the judgment passed today in
Crl.A.No.813/2011 tilted as ‘State vs. Pankaj Chaudhary’.
2.For detailed order, please see the above mentioned judgment.
(G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE
AUGUST 17, 2011 vk
(S. RAVINDRA BHAT) JUDGE
Crl.A. No.993/2009 Page 1 of 1