CRL.M.C./856/2011 of UMESH KUMAR & ORS Vs STATE & ANR
Parties
- UMESH KUMAR & ORS (PETITIONER)
- STATE & ANR (RESPONDENT)
Cited by (1)
Counts citations resolved within this build's own ingested judgment corpus. The true corpus-wide count will be higher until more of the corpus is ingested.
Cites (0 resolved of 1 detected)
1 case citation detected in this judgment's own text, but none resolved to a judgment page in this build yet.
Statutes cited (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CRL.M.C. 856/2011
& ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Dushyant Swaroop, Advocate with the Petitioners in person.
UMESH KUMAR & ORS
versus
STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Pawan Bah1, APP for the State with SI Amar Singh, 1290-D, PS Krishna Nagar, Delhi. Mr. Gopesh Tripathi, Advocate for Respondent No.2 with Complainant/Respondent No.2 in person. Through: Mr. Pawan Bah1, APP for the State with SI Amar Singh, 1290-D, PS Krishna Nagar, Delhi. Mr. Gopesh Tripathi, Advocate for Respondent No.2 with Complainant/Respondent No.2 in person.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
ORDER 17.03.2011
Crl. M.A. No. 3217/2011 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Crl. M.C. 856/2011
This is petition for quashing of FIR No. 219/2006 under Sections
Respondent No. 2 Chander Bhan on the ground that the parties are neighbours and have amicably resolved their differences and do not want to
CRL.MC. 856/2011 Page 1 of 3 Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By:AMULYACertify that the digital file andphysical file have been compared andthe digital data is as per the physicalfile and no page is missing.
pursue the same.
The Complainant/Respondent No. 2 Mr. Chander Bhan is present in person and is identified by his learned counsel and the Investigating Officer SI Amar Singh, PS Krishan Nagar. Respondent No. 2 states that since the Petitioners are living in his neighbourhood, the fight ensued between them on petty issue and wants to live amicably in the neighbourhood, he does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties. The parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion. The Petitioners, who are identified by their counsel and Respondent No.2 are living in the neighbourhood. The pendency of the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto will bring further acrimony in their relations. There is no legal impediment in quashing the abovementioned FIR. In the interest of justice, FIR No. 219/2006 under Sections 323/34/452 IPC registered at PS Krishan Nagar, Delhi and the proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.
Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court. CRL.MC. 856/2011 Page2of3 statements made before this Court. CRL.MC. 856/2011 Page2of3
The pe ttlon t. · IS · disposed of . 0 r er astl. .
MARCH 17,2011
1 ;J,...Jt ik rvo·1 * 4'
CRL.M.C. 856/2011
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
Page3 of3