W.P.(CRL)/97/2012 of PIU CHAKRABORTY Vs STATE & ANR
Parties
- In view of the law laid down by the Honble Supreme [Court ][in.]Gangadhar Janardan Mhatre (PETITIONER)
- Signature Not Verified (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1 resolved of 2 detected)
Statutes cited (2)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
63# $-* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI [AT ][NEW ][DELHI]
+ w.P.(cRL) 97 t2012
PIII CHAKRABORTY
CORAM:
I{ON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
ORDER18.01.2012
By this petition the Petitioner seeks registration of [the ][FIR.]
l,earned counsel for the Petitioner states that the facts are crystal clearand self speaking, thus FIR has to be registered on [the cornplaint ][filed ][by ][the]Pctitioner by the Respondent.
In view of the law laid down by the Honble Supreme [Court ][in.]Gangadhar Janardan Mhatre vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors., 2004 [(7)]SCC 768, Minu Kumari & Ann vs. State of Bihar & Ors [(2006) 4 SCC ][359]and Aleque Padamsee & Ors vs UOI & Ors, 2007 (6) SCC I7I since analternate remedy of filing complaint case under Section 200 Cr. P.C. [along]with an application under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. is available to thew.P.(cRL) 97/2012Page 1 of 2
Petitioner, the writ [petition ][seeking ][directions ][for ][registration ][of ][the ][FIR ][is]
not maintainable.
The Petitioner would be [at ][liberty ][to ][approach ][the ][learned]
Metropolitan Magistrate [by filing ][a ][complaint, ][who ][would ][in ][case ][a]
complaint is filed, take action in [accordance ][with ][law.]
Petition is dismissed accordingly.
JANUARY I8,2OI2tvnt
Ua^*,h /x,"4rln/' / / [J-]MUKTA GUPTA, J.
w.P.(cRL) 97/2012
Page 2 of 2