W.P.(CRL)/1082/2015 of GANESH KUMAR & ANR Vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS
Parties
- GANESH KUMAR & ANR (PETITIONER)
- STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1)
- WRIT PETITION 732 of 2016 (2025)
Statutes cited (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+W.P.(CRL) 1082/2015
GANESH KUMAR & ANR..... Petitioners
Through:Mr. S.K. Singh, Adv.
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS..... RespondentsThrough:Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel(Crl.) for the State with Mr. Amrit Singh with ASILakhi Singh, PS KalyanpuriThrough:Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel(Crl.) for the State with Mr. Amrit Singh with ASILakhi Singh, PS Kalyanpuri
Mr.H. Rehman, Adv. for R-2
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMARO R R%17.08.2015
Crl.M.A.7755/2015
Exemption granted subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
W.P.(CRL) 1082/2015
The petitioners seek quashing of the FIR No.185/2014 (PS Kalyan Puri)instituted under Sections 308 & 34 IPC.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners as well as respondent No.2that the disputes between the parties have been resolved.It is stated onbehalf of the petitioners that emanating from the same dispute, two otherFIRs were instituted namely FIR No.186/2014 and FIR No.649/2014 in thesame police station.
FIR No.186/2014 has been lodged by one of the petitioners of this case.
Similarly, FIR No.649/2014 was also lodged by one of the parties to thedispute.
In the present case (FIR No.185/2014), it has been alleged by respondentNo.2 that when the petitioners were asked to go away from/near the flat ofrespondent No.1, they pelted stones. In the same transaction, the petitionerswere also injured leading to lodging of FIR No.186/2014.
Learned counsel for the petitioners and respondents have, in unison, statedthat FIR No.186/2014 and 649/2014 (P.S. Kalyan Puri) have been quashedin two separate petitions by Bench of this Court. Photocopies of the ordersby which such FIRs have been quashed have been produced during thecourse of hearing of this petition.
Let those be taken on record.
The dispute is with respect to possession and ownership of the house, whichhas been settled and no useful purpose would be served in allowing this FIRto be investigated any further.
For the aforesaid reasons viz., the settlement between the parties and thequashing of other FIRs referred to above, this Court is inclined to quash thepresent FIR (FIR No.185/2014, P.S.Kalyanpuri).
The FIR No.185/2014 is quashed along with its resultant proceedings.
The petition is allowed.
AUGUST 17, 2015/ns
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J