BAIL APPLN./601/2015 of RAHUL DAS Vs STATE ( NCT OF DELHI)

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2015-08-27
Bench: INDERMEET KAUR
Case number: 7930 of 2015

Parties

> Through Mr. R.D. Rana, Adv (PETITIONER)
THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1 resolved of 2 detected)

CRL.L.P./602/2022 of MS SACHDEVA ENTERPRISES Vs THE STATE AND ANR (2025)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+BAIL APPLN. 992/2015 & Cr1. M.A. No.7930/2015RAHUL DASS

Petitioner

ThroughMr. R.D. Rana, Adv.

versus

THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI)

.....RespondentThroughMs. Kusum Dhalla, APP for the Statealong with SI Kailash.

+BAIL APPLN. 601/2015RAHUL DASRAHUL DAS

Petitioner

ThroughMr. R.D. Rana, Adv.

versus

STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

.....Respondent

ThroughMs. Kusum Dhalla, APP for the Statealong with SI Kailash.along with SI Kailash.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR

ORDER

%27.08.2015

These are two FIRS against the petitioner. The first FIR is FIRNo.157/20 15 registered on the complaint of Sint. 'SB' for an incidentdated 11.02.2015. The second FIR which is FIR No.452/2015 is lodgedby the same complainant qua the incident of later date i.e. of07.04.2015. The contents of the FIRs disclose that 'SB' was employedwith the petitioner Dr.Rahul Dass who is working as PolyTechnicians with the NDMC, Gole Market. As per her averments, she

has been employed to cook and wash the utensils at monthly incomeof Rs.6,000/-. Thereafter she developed friendship with him and onthe promise of marriage, she had made physical relationship with himboth on 11.02.2015 and thereafter again on 07.04.2015 which waswithout her consent. Bench of this Court on an earlier date hadgranted interim protection to the petitioner; there was rider that thevictim shall not be coerced or pressurized by the petitioner; this riderwill continue to remain in force and with the additional embargo that hewill not meet the victim.

The petitioner has joined investigation. He had last appearedbefore the Investigating Officer on 05.06.2015.

Accordingly, in the event of arrest petitioner be admitted to bailin both the FIRs on his furnishing personal bond in the sum ofRs.20,000/- with one surety of like amount subject to the satisfaction ofthe Investigating Officer. He shall continue to join inv,stigation as andwhen summoned by the Investigating Officer.

Applications disposed of

INDERMEET KAUR, J

AUGUST 27, 2015A