CRL.A./1164/2015 of PARAMJIT SINGH Vs STATE & ANR
Parties
- PARAMJIT SINGH (PETITIONER)
- STATE & ANR (RESPONDENT)
Cited by (5)
Counts citations resolved within this build's own ingested judgment corpus. The true corpus-wide count will be higher until more of the corpus is ingested.
- W.P.(CRL)/497/2024 of MOHIT & ORS. Vs THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. (2024)
- BAIL APPLN./1864/2024 of JAWED IMAM SIDDIQUI Vs DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT (2024)
- BAIL APPLN./3406/2024 of ANKUSH JAIN Vs DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT (2024)
- BAIL APPLN./973/2020 of JEEVEK NAGPAL Vs STATE (2020)
- CRL.L.P./604/2015 of STATE Vs AHMED SHAKIL & ORS (2015)
Cites (0 resolved of 1 detected)
1 case citation detected in this judgment's own text, but none resolved to a judgment page in this build yet.
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+CRL.A. 1164/2015
PARAMJIT SINGH
..... Appellant
ThroughNone.
versus
STATE & ANR
ThroughNone.
..... Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMARO R R%24.11.2015
The present case has been lying at the filing counter for long timeunder objections for removal of defects.
note has been put up by the Registry that under the Provisions ofChapter 1, Part-A(a) 5(2) of the High Court Rules and Orders, if amemorandum of appeal is not taken back for amendment, the same shall beregistered and listed before the Court for its dismissal for non-Prosecution.The aforesaid provision applies to all matters: civil and criminal.
Since no effort has been made to collect the memorandum of petitionfor removing the defect and re-filing the same, the petition is dismissed.
However, the petitioner would be at liberty to file fresh application incase the grievance still remains to be redressed.
NOVEMBER 24, 2015/ab
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J