EX.P./191/2013 of COL TEJINDER SINGH (RETD) Vs D S CONSTRUCTION LTD

$~16 & 20

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+EX.P. 191/2013, E.A. Nos.501/2013 & 369/2014

COL TEJINDER SINGH (RETD)..... Decree HolderThroughMr.Rohit Gandhi, Adv.ThroughMr.Rohit Gandhi, Adv.

versus

S CONSTRUCTION LTD..... Judgment DebtorThroughMr.AshishDholakia,Adv.withMr.Gautam Bajaj & Mr.D.KishoreKumar, Advs.ThroughMr.AshishDholakia,Adv.withMr.Gautam Bajaj & Mr.D.KishoreKumar, Advs.

+O.M.P. 124/2014

M/S DS CONSTRUCTIONS LTD..... PetitionerThroughMr.AshishDholakia,Adv.withMr.Gautam Bajaj & Mr.D.KishoreKumar, Advs.ThroughMr.AshishDholakia,Adv.withMr.Gautam Bajaj & Mr.D.KishoreKumar, Advs.

versus

M/S HIMALAYA AGENCIES..... RespondentThroughMr.Rohit Gandhi, Adv.ThroughMr.Rohit Gandhi, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGHO R R%15.03.2016

I.A. No./2016 (u/O XXIII, Rule 3 CPC to be numbered by theRegistry) & O.M.P.No.124/2014 and EX.P. 191/2013, E.A. Nos.501/2013& 369/2014

Both the parties have resolved the disputes. Today the parties havehanded over the present joint application under Order XXIII Rule 3 read

with Section 151 CPC, for recording the terms and conditions of thesettlement and passing an appropriate order.The Registry is directed tonumber the same.

The terms and conditions of the settlement are recorded in paras 3 ofthe application. The application is duly signed by the parties as well as theirrespective counsel. The same is also supported by the affidavits of both theparties along with the resolution for settling the matter. The parties shall bebound by the terms and conditions of the settlement. Judgment-debtor hashanded over cheque of Rs.5 lacs in the name of decree-holder. Other postdated cheques have also been issued by the judgment-debtor who hasensured that the cheques if presented in time, will be encashed.

Accordingly, the abovementioned petition as well as executionpetition are disposed of.

No order as to costs.

MANMOHAN SINGH, J.

MARCH 15, 2016/vp