BAIL APPLN./1678/2016 of SANJAY SINGH @ SANJAY PARTAP SINGH Vs THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI)

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2016-09-27
Bench: AMIT CHAUDHARY, GURGAON POLICE SHALL, I E ARCHANA SINGH, K U BHAN, LATER ON, VILLAGE VAZIRABAD
Case number: 12774 of 2016

Parties

SANJAY SINGH @ SANJAY PARTAP SINGH (PETITIONER)
THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1)

CRL.L.P./602/2022 of MS SACHDEVA ENTERPRISES Vs THE STATE AND ANR (2025)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1678/2016

SANJAY SINGH @ SANJAY PARTAP SINGH

..... Petitioner

Through: Mr. Abhijat, Tejeshwar Sharma, Vijay Kumar, Udai Bhan and Amit Choudhry, Adv.

versus

THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI)

..... Respondent

Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP Mr S Azad, Meenu Sharma and M Aslam for R-2

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI

O R R% 27.09.2016

Crl. M.A. No. 12774/2016

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.

BAIL APPLN. 1678/2016

It is informed that the charge sheet stands filed in the matter and the matter is now listed on 05.10.2016 for consideration on charge. The trial court is directed to proceed with the said consideration on the said date. No adjournment shall be sought either by the prosecution or by the accused. In

case charge is framed, the recording of evidence of the public witnesses shall be expedited. It is hoped that before the next date, the same shall be recorded in case charge is framed.

The wife of the petitioner has provided the present residential address, i.e. Archana Singh, House No.1523, Village Vazirabad, Gurgaon. The police shall, in the meantime, verify the said address of the petitioner.

List on 15.12.2016.

SEPTEMBER 27, 2016

VIPIN SANGHI, J

Later on, Mr. Amit Chaudhary and Mr. K.U. Bhan, Advocates has appeared along with Ms. Archana Singh, the parokar of the petitioner. She states that the petitioner does not wish to pursue the petition any further and wishes to withdraw the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the direction issued to the trial court shall be adhered to. copy of this order be transmitted to the trial court for compliance.

SEPTEMBER 27, 2016

VIPIN SANGHI, J