W.P.(CRL)/2588/2016 of SHYAM GARERA & ANR Vs STATE OF DELHI & ANR
Parties
- + W.P.(CRL) 2588/2016 SHYAM GARERA & ANR (PETITIONER)
- STATE OF DELHI & ANR (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1)
Statutes cited (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+W.P.(CRL) 2588/2016SHYAM GARERA & ANRSHYAM GARERA & ANR
..... PetitionersThrough :Mr. Vikas Manchanda and Mr. AmitManchanda, Advs.Manchanda, Advs.
versus
STATE OF DELHI & ANR..... RespondentsThrough :Ms. Meghna Bahl, Adv. for Mr. AviSingh, ASC with SI Manish KumarPS Shalimar Bagh.Mr. Mahesh Gupta, Adv. for R-2 withR-2 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAKO R R%05.12.2016
On the complaint of respondent no.2, present FIR No.1293/2015under Sections 283/336 IPC was registered at police station Shalimar Baghagainst the petitioners. Respondent no.2 and petitioners have settled theirdisputes amicably.Respondent no.2 is present in Court and has beenidentified by SI Manish Kumar PS Shalimar Bagh.Respondent no.2submits that he has settled the matter with the petitioners of his own freewill and without any pressure, undue coercion and influence.He alsosubmits that he is neighbour of the petitioners. He further submits that he isnot willing to pursue the FIR any further in view of the settlement arrived at
between him and the petitioners.
Keeping in mind the above facts, in the interest of justice, FIRNo.1293/2015 under Sections 283/336 IPC registered at police stationShalimar Bagh and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom, arequashed in view of the settlement arrived at between the petitioners andrespondent no.2.
Petition is disposed of in the above terms.
DECEMBER 05, 2016/dk
A.K. PATHAK, J.