CRL.M.C./2283/2016 of ALOK GUPTA Vs STATE & ANR
Parties
- ALOK GUPTA (PETITIONER)
- STATE & ANR (RESPONDENT)
Cited by (1)
Counts citations resolved within this build's own ingested judgment corpus. The true corpus-wide count will be higher until more of the corpus is ingested.
Cites (1)
Statutes cited (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CRL.M.C. 2283/2016 & Crl.M.A.No.9592/2016 (stay)
ALOK GUPTA ..... Petitioner Represented by : Mr.Avadh Kaushik and Mr. Luvashish Maharishi, Advs.
versus
STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Represented by : Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP. Si Rajendra Dhaka, PS Vikaspuri.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
18.10.2016
1.By the present petition, the Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 88/2009 under Sections 420/468/471 IPC registered at PSVikas Puri, Delhi on the complaint of Mr.Ashok Kumar Raizada on the ground that parties have settled the matter. Though the complainant is Ashok Kumar Raizada, petitioner has impleaded Delhi Nagrik Sehkari Bank Limited as respondent
2.Even if the monetary consideration with the bank has been settled, that does not absolve the petitioner of the criminal liability and particularly without impleading and settling the matter with the complainant, the petitioner could not have filed the present petition seeking quashing of the FIR on the basis of the compromise.
3.Though the complainant Ashok Kumar Raizada has not been
impleaded as party, learned counsel appears for him and states that there has been no settlement between the parties.
4.Considering the facts noted above, the petition and application are dismissed with cost of ₹10,000/- to be deposited with Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee within two weeks.
OCTOBER 18, 2016
MUKTA GUPTA, J