W.P.(CRL)/2466/2016 of RAJENDER JOSHI & ORS Vs STATE & ANR

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2016-10-25
Bench: S P GARG S P GARG
Case number: 25 of 2015

Parties

RAJENDER JOSHI & ORSThrough: Mr. B.C. Joshi, Adv.Through: Mr. B.C. Joshi, Adv (PETITIONER)
STATE & ANR (RESPONDENT)

Cites (0 resolved of 1 detected)

1 case citation detected in this judgment's own text, but none resolved to a judgment page in this build yet.

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Header

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+W.P.(CRL) 2466/2016

RAJENDER JOSHI & ORSThrough: Mr. B.C. Joshi, Adv.Through: Mr. B.C. Joshi, Adv.

..... Petitioners

versus

STATE & ANR

..... RespondentsThrough:Mr. Piyush Singhal, Adv. for Mr.AshishAggarwal,ASCwithSIManisha Sharma, P.A. Aman Viharfor respondent no. 1Mr.VikasSharma,Adv.withrespondent no. 2 in personAshishAggarwal,ASCwithSIManisha Sharma, P.A. Aman Viharfor respondent no. 1Mr.VikasSharma,Adv.withrespondent no. 2 in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R R%23.08.2016

Petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2 were married on 30[th]November,

2012 according to the Hindu rites and ceremonies. They could hardly livetogether for about four months.On the complaint of respondent no. 2,present FIR No. 25/2015 under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC was registered atPolice Station Aman Vihar against the petitioner no. 1 and his relatives, thatis, petitioner nos. 2 to 7.On 28[th]September, 2015 petitioner no. 1 andrespondent no. 2 have settled their disputes amicably before the MediationCentre, Rohini. Their marriage has been dissolved by decree of divorce by

mutual consent on 4[th]June, 2016 passed by the Family Court, Rohini.Respondent no. 2 is present in Court and has been identified by SI ManishaSharma, P.S. Aman Vihar. Respondent no. 2 submits that she has receivedthe entire settled amount from the petitioner no. 1 and she has no objectionin case FIR in question is quashed.

Keeping in mind the fact that parties have settled their disputes

amicably, inasmuch as petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2 have partedways, no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the criminalproceedings pending.In the interest of justice, FIR No. 25/2015 underSections 498-A/406/34 IPC registered at Police Station Aman Vihar and the

consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

Writ petition is disposed of in the above terms.

Dasti.

AUGUST 23, 2016rb

A.K. PATHAK, J.