W.P.(C)/2590/2016 of SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Vs USHA & ORS

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2016-08-12
Case number: 2590/2016

Parties

SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (PETITIONER)
USHA & ORS (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1)

CRL.REV.P./909/2022 of MANISH JAIN Vs USHA & ORS. (2024)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 2590/2016 & CM No. 10996/2016

SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Adv. Through: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Adv.

versus

USHA & ORS ..... Respondents

Through: Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, Adv. for R-2. 2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI O R RO R R% 12.08.2016

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no adjudication regarding quantum of gratuity to be paid to respondent no.1, therefore, the impugned recovery certificate could not have been issued.

Learned counsel for respondent no.2 submits that the remedy of statutory appeal under Section 7 of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 has yet to be exhausted.

In these circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition and pursue appropriate remedies as per law.

Dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty granted.

AUGUST 12, 2016/kk

NAJMI WAZIRI, J