W.P.(C)/3395/2016 of M/S PARABOLIC DRUGS LTD. Vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS
Parties
- M/S PARABOLIC DRUGS LTD (PETITIONER)
- UNION OF INDIA & ORS (RESPONDENT)
Cites (0 resolved of 1 detected)
1 case citation detected in this judgment's own text, but none resolved to a judgment page in this build yet.
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 3395/2016
M/S PARABOLIC DRUGS LTD. ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Balbir Singh, Mr.Rupender Sinhmar, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Mrinalini Sen,
Mr.M.Chatterjee, Advs. for R-1&2.
Mr.Manish Mohan, CGSC for BIFR/R-3.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R R% 25.04.2016
CM 14493/2016
Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions.
W.P.(C) 3395/2016
1.Pursuant to notification dated April 18, 2016 nomination has been made of member to BIFR and the problem of lack of quorum has now been overcome for the reason prior thereto there was only one member left on BIFR.
2.Learned counsel for the petitioner states that when the writ petition was drafted it was on the assumption that nomination of the vacancy to BIFR had not been made, but would hasten to add that both members of BIFR are holding additional charge and to the knowledge and information of the petitioner no sitting by the Board has taken place as yet.
W.P.(C) 3395/2016
page 1 of 2
3.Since two members have been nominated to BIFR and there is quorum available we decline to entertain the present petition which has been filed invoking extraordinary writ jurisdiction of this Court on the ground that statutory forum available is not sitting due to lack of quorum.
4.But, we simultaneously direct that BIFR should hold meeting every day and at least for two hours. Such matters which require urgent consideration should be taken up by BIFR.
5.Instant matter is of one such kind.
6.On an application filed in the Registry of BIFR the pending reference before BIFR being case No.82/2015 shall be placed along with the application before BIFR within this week itself. before BIFR being case No.82/2015 shall be placed along with the application before BIFR within this week itself.
7.BIFR shall proceed to hear the matter and pass appropriate orders.
8.Copy of this order be supplied dasti under signatures of the Court Master to learned counsel for the petitioner.
9.No cost.
CM 14492/2016 (stay)
Dismissed as infructuous.
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.
APRIL 25, 2016 ‘ga’
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
W.P.(C) 3395/2016