W.P.(C)/6085/2016 of MAHAVIR SINGH Vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS
Parties
- MAHAVIR SINGH (PETITIONER)
- UNION OF INDIA & ORS (RESPONDENT)
Cited by (1)
Counts citations resolved within this build's own ingested judgment corpus. The true corpus-wide count will be higher until more of the corpus is ingested.
Cites (0 resolved of 1 detected)
1 case citation detected in this judgment's own text, but none resolved to a judgment page in this build yet.
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 6085/2016
MAHAVIR SINGH
..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Bharat Bhushan, Advocate
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS
..... Respondents
Represented by: Mr.Vijay Joshi, Sr. Counsel instructed by Ms.Debajyoti Behuria, Advocate
CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOGHON’BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI
O R R% 18.07.2016
CM No.24942/2016
Allowed.
W.P.(C) 6085/2016
1.The ill drafted writ petition, after hearing counsel for the petitioner, would suffer dismissal on account of inchoate pleadings and lack of pleadings attacking the reasons in the impugned order.
2.Faced as aforesaid learned counsel seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file fresh petition.
3.Granting liberty as prayed for and keeping open the issue of delay and
latches for the reasons the final order passed on February 28, 2013 is being challenged after more than three years, requiring petitioner to explain the W.P.(C) 6085/2016 Page 1 of 2
delay if fresh petition is filed, instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with remedy available to file fresh petition. with remedy available to file fresh petition.
4.The issue of territorial jurisdiction is also kept pending.
5.No costs.
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.
JULY 18, 2016 ‘pg’
PRATIBHA RANI, J.
W.P.(C) 6085/2016