BAIL APPLN./2508/2015 of SURENDER BHARDWAJ Vs THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI)
Parties
- Represented by: Mr. Vinay K. Sharma, Advocate. Advocate (PETITIONER)
- THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI (RESPONDENT)
Cites (0 resolved of 1 detected)
1 case citation detected in this judgment's own text, but none resolved to a judgment page in this build yet.
Statutes cited (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ BAIL APPLN. 2508/2015
SURENDER BHARDWAJ ..... Petitioner
Represented by: Mr. Vinay K. Sharma, Advocate. Advocate.
versus
THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI)
..... Respondent
Represented by: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the
State.
Mr. Udham Singh, Advocate for the complainant. for the complainant.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
27.10.2016
1.Learned counsel for the petitioner and complainant states that the parties have arrived at settlement. Exchange of articles has been done and the parties will shortly be filing petition seeking quashing of the FIR in question.
2.Considering the fact that the parties have settled the matter, it would be in the interest of justice to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
3.It is, therefore, directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner in
FIR No. 628/2015 under Sections 323/354/392/506/34 IPC registered at PS Palam Village, the petitioner be released on bail on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of ₹15,000/- with one surety of the like amount, subject to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer/SHO concerned, further subject to the condition that he will join the investigation as and when directed by the BAIL APPLN. 2508/2015 Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of 2
Investigating Officer and will not leave the country without prior permission of the learned Trial Court.
4.Petition is disposed of.
5.Order dasti.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
OCTOBER 27, 2016
BAIL APPLN. 2508/2015