CRL.M.C./64/2016 of JAGDISH BHARTI & ORS Vs THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR
Parties
- Represented by: Mr.K.N.Jha, Adv (PETITIONER)
- THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 64/2016 JAGDISH BHARTI & ORS
..... Petitioners
Represented by: Mr.K.N.Jha, Adv versus
THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR
..... Respondents
Represented by: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the
State with ASI Om Prakash, PS Hauz Khas, Delhi in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT
O R R% 08.01.2016
Crl. M.A. No.266/2016 (Exemption)
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Accordingly, the application is allowed.
Crl.M.A.No.267/2016 (Delay)
In view of the averments made in the application, the delay of
38 days in re-filing the instant petition is condoned.
Accordingly, the application is allowed.
CRL.M.C. No.64/2016
After some arguments, learned counsel appearing on behalf of
petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to urge all the issues before learned Trial Court.
Permission is granted with liberty, as prayed for.
Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
JANUARY 08, 2016/M
SURESH KAIT, J