BAIL APPLN./4/2016 of ANAND KUMAR Vs STATE
Parties
- + BAIL APPLN. 4/2016 & CRL.M.A.10/2016 ANAND KUMAR (PETITIONER)
- STATE (RESPONDENT)
Cites (0 resolved of 1 detected)
1 case citation detected in this judgment's own text, but none resolved to a judgment page in this build yet.
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ BAIL APPLN. 4/2016 & CRL.M.A.10/2016 ANAND KUMAR
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rohit Agarwal, Advocate
versus
STATE
..... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
% 04.01.2016
The present is an application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking regular bail in FIR No.655/2013, under Section 302 IPC, registered at Police Station- Bindapur, Delhi.
The applicant has been in custody since 09.04.2014. Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant states that out of 23 witnesses cited on behalf of the prosecution, 21 have already been examined and discharged by the trial court.
It is trite to state that every accused is entitled to an expeditious trial, particularly when his personal liberty has been curtailed as consequence of the accusations levelled against him.
Accordingly, without commenting on the merits of the present case, I request the trial court to expeditiously conclude the trial and render decision, without granting any unwarranted adjournment to counsel appearing on behalf of the parties, preferably within period of four months from the next date of
hearing before the trial court.
The application is disposed of accordingly.
However, liberty is reserved to the applicant to move this Court afresh in
the event the trial is not concluded expeditiously.
JANUARY 04, 2016 dn
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J