BAIL APPLN./323/2016 of AMAN GOEL Vs THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2016-08-23
Bench: DELHI, NIKHIL SHARMA ARE CONCERNED
Case number: 78 of 2016

Parties

AMAN GOEL (PETITIONER)
THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1)

CRL.L.P./602/2022 of MS SACHDEVA ENTERPRISES Vs THE STATE AND ANR (2025)

Statutes cited (2)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 323/2016

AMAN GOEL

..... Petitioner

Through: Ms. Sumita Kapil, Advocate with Ms. Astha, Advocate

versus

THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through:

..... Respondent

Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP with Inspector Upender Singh, PS- Mehrauli

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL

O R R% 12.02.2016

CRL.M.A.2444/2016 (Exemption)

Exemption granted subject to all just exceptions.

The application is disposed of accordingly.

BAIL APPLN.323/2016

The present is an application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) praying for extension of interim bail granted to applicant on medical grounds.

It is an admitted position that the applicant is currently hospitalized in Eden Hospital Private Limited, East of Kailash, New Delhi.

The health condition of the applicant is stated to be critical as he suffers from epilepsy, fatty liver and stone in the kidney. Further, the applicant has suffered various epileptic strokes in hospital, as consequence of which on one occasion he has suffered fall, which has resulted in fracture in his leg and on another occasion he has suffered injuries to his backbone and head. The applicant is also stated to have contracted chickungunya, which has debilitated him further. This Court has from time to time, since July, 2015, released the applicant on interim bail.

By way of order dated 14.01.2016, in Bail Application No.78/2016, this Court was pleased to further extend the interim bail granted to the applicant for period of one month.

In view of the foregoing, it is considered just, necessary and expedient to extend the interim bail granted to the applicant on the same terms and conditions as imposed by this Court by way of order dated 06.07.2015, passed in Bail Application No.1240/2015, for further period of one month from today.

With the above directions, the present application is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

Dasti.

FEBRUARY 12, 2016 dn

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J