NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph โ€” Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

CO.PET./197/2014 of M/S PIVOT MULTIFAR INDUSTEIAL SERVICES LTD. Vs M/S DSC LIMITED

Court
Delhi High Court
Decision date
2016-03-15
Case number
941/2016

Parties

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+CO.PET. 197/2014

PIVOT MULTIFAR INDUSTRIAL SERVICES LTD. ..... Petitioner

Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar and Mr. AdityaNayyar, Advocates

versus

M/S DSC LIMITED

..... Respondent

Through: Mr. Rajnish Kumar, Advocate

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHERO R R%15.03.2016

CA 941/2016 (for withdrawal of the petition)

This is an application seeking, in effect, withdrawal of thecaptioned petition.

The learned counsel for the applicant / petitioner says that leavewas sought to withdraw the aforementioned petition as the legalnotice dated 11.11.2013 was not served on the registered office of thenon-applicant/respondent.

Issue notice to the non-applicant/respondent.

Mr. Rajnish Kumar accepts notice on behalf of the non-applicant/respondent.

Mr. Rajnish Kumar says that he does not wish to file reply tothe captioned application. The learned counsel further states that heCO.PET. 197/2014page 1 of 2

has no objection to the application being allowed.

The applicant/petitioner has sought leave to withdrawwith liberty to file fresh petition.

Accordingly,theapplicationisallowed.Theaccompanying petition will stand dismissed as withdrawn withliberty to the applicant/petitioner to file fresh petition; albeitin accordance with law.

CO.PET. 197/2014

In view of the order passed in CA 941/2016, no further ordersare called for in the captioned petition.

The captioned petition is, accordingly, disposed of.

MARCH 15, 2016yg

CO.PET. 197/2014

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J

page 2 of 2