CONT.APP.(C)/3/2016 of SGT CHAMAN LAL Vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS
Parties
- CONT.APP.(C)/3/2016 of SGT CHAMAN LAL (PETITIONER)
- UNION OF INDIA & ORS (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.APP.(C) 3/2016, C.M. APPL.7985/2016 SGT CHAMAN LAL ..... Appellant
..... Appellant
Through : Appellant in person.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS
..... Respondents
Through : Ms. Barkha Babbar, Advocate, for UOI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA
O R R% 04.03.2016
We notice that the impugned order has dismissed the contempt petition preferred by the appellant by virtue of Section 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 [hereafter “the Act”]. Section 19(1) of the Act stipulates that appeals lie when the Court exercises its jurisdiction to punish for contempt and not otherwise. Since contempt petition itself was dismissed, the appeal clearly does not lie. This view has been confirmed by the decisions of this Court as well as the Supreme Court. However, it is open to the appellant to avail of all such remedies as are available in law. The appeal is accordingly dismissed as not maintainable.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
MARCH 04, 2016/ajk
DEEPA SHARMA, J