BAIL APPLN./1522/2015 of AMIT WALIA Vs THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI)

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2016-09-14
Bench: A K PATHAK

Parties

AMIT WALIA (PETITIONER)
THE STATE ( GOVTOFNOT OF DELHI (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1)

TEST.CAS./31/2003 of MOHINDER SINGH Vs THE STATE AC+ (2017)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Header

I[e::>]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+BAIL APPLN. 1522/2015

AMIT WALIA

Petitioner

Through:Mr. Sunil Kumar Agarwal and Ms.Neelam Agarwal, Advs.

versus

THE STATE ( GOVTOFNOT OF DELHI)

Respondent

Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APPComplainant in person.

AND

+BAIL APPLN. 1524/2015

VEENA KUMARI WALIA @ VEENA WALIA

Petitioner

ThroughMr. Sunil Kumar Agarwal and Ms.Neelam Agarwal, Advs.

versus

THE STATE ( GOVT OF NOT OF DELHI)Respondent

Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, APPComplainant in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

ORDER

14.09.2016

Petitioners are husband and mother-in-law of the complainant.has in thethat after theshe wasComplainant alleged complaint marriage,not treatedproperlyin the matrimonialhome. She was tauntedfor bringinginsufficientdowry. While she was pregnant,petitionersdid not take hercare and provide food.Petitioners also taunted that she was not beautiful.Petitionersaskedherto spendher salaryfor runningthe household. On 17^January, 2014 she told her husband about the maltreatment from mother-in-law on whichheher. Achildwas bom on 11"^ slappedprematureFebmary,2014. However,petitionersdid not spend any money on delivery.

pemsalofthe order dated 30^"^ July, 2015 indicatesthat petitioners

offered to deposit ?1,00,000/- with the Investigating Officer, withoutprejudice to their rights and contentions. Accordingly, it was ordered thaton deposit of this amount vide demand draft, same be released tocomplainant.Leamed APP submits that amount was deposited by thepetitioner and in fact, has been released to complainant.Investigations areover and charge-sheet has been filed.

Keeping in mind the totality of facts and circumstances, it is orderedthat in case of arrest, petitioners be released on anticipatory bail subject totheir fumishing personal bond in the sum of ?25,000/-(Rupees Twenty

Five ThousandOnly) each with one surety each in the like amount to thesatisfactionofthe InvestigationOfficer/ArrestingOfficer/SHOconcerned.

Bail applicationsare disposedof in the aboveterms. Dasti.

SEPTEMBER 14,2016rb>

A.MJPATHAK, J.