W.P.(CRL)/207/2016 of PRAKASH S. TEWANI & ORS Vs THE STATE AND ANR
Parties
- PRAKASH S. TEWANI & ORS (PETITIONER)
- THE STATE AND ANR (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+W.P.(CRL) 207/2016 & CRL.M.A. 1129/2016
PRAKASH S. TEWANI & ORS...... Petitioners
Through:Mr. Jayant K. Mehta and Mr. KunalBahri, Advs.Bahri, Advs.
versus
THE STATE AND ANR...... Respondents
Through:Ms. Nandita Rao, ASC with SIKamal Kumar Yadav, P.S. OIA, NewDelhi for respondent no. 1Mr. Milan Deep Singh, Adv. forrespondent no. 2Kamal Kumar Yadav, P.S. OIA, NewDelhi for respondent no. 1Mr. Milan Deep Singh, Adv. forrespondent no. 2
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAKO R R
%17.11.2016
Learned counsel for the petitioners has prayed for quashing of theFIR. Learned Additional Standing Counsel submits that closure report hasalready been filed in the court of concerned Metropolitan Magistrate.Inview of this statement of learned Additional Standing Counsel, learnedcounsel for the petitioners has not pressed this petition at this stage. Writpetition is disposed of as not pressed at this stage.Miscellaneousapplication is disposed of as infructuous.
NOVEMBER 17, 2016/rb
A.K. PATHAK, J.