BAIL APPLN./2633/2015 of BHIM RAJ SINGH Vs THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2016-07-26

Parties

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFDELHIATNEWDELHI+BAIL APPLN. 2633/2015BHIM RAJ SINGH (PETITIONER)
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1)

TEST.CAS./31/2003 of MOHINDER SINGH Vs THE STATE AC+ (2017)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

*INTHEHIGHCOURTOFDELHIATNEWDELHI+BAIL APPLN. 2633/2015BHIM RAJ SINGH..... PetitionerThrough :Mr. Bheem Sharma and Mr. R. S.Sharma, Advs.

versus

THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

..... Respondent

Through :Mr. Sudershan Joon, APP with ASIGurmukh Singh PS Sec-23 Dwarka.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAKO R R

26.07.2016

Complainant has specifically stated in the FIR that three personsstopped him at 11:45 pm on 21[st]November, 2015 near Goyala Dairy androbbed his car.They also beat him.It is further stated that certaindocuments, mobile no.[REDACTED], purse containing Rs.300/- and adriving license was also in the car.Telephone call was made at number100.Learned APP submits that GPS was there in the robbed car.Locationof the car was traced at Hirankudana, Delhi and co-accused Vimal wasarrested along with car.He was also identified by the complainant.On hisdisclosure, other accused namely Chander Pal was arrested. Petitioner hasalso been named.He is evading arrest.

Keeping in mind the serious allegations, I do no find it to be fit case

for anticipatory bail since custodial interrogation is required, inasmuch as,

his TIP is to be conducted.

Bail application is dismissed.

JULY 26, 2016/dk

A.K. PATHAK, J.