CRL.M.C./1262/2016 of JAGDISH LAL & ORS Vs THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI)
Parties
- JAGDISH LAL & ORS (PETITIONER)
- THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI (RESPONDENT)
Cites (3)
Statutes cited (2)
- constitution of india, article-226 (1950)
- constitution of india (1950)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+CRL.M.C. 1262/2016
JAGDISH LAL & ORS
..... Petitioners
Through :Mr.Deepak Arora, Advocate alongwith petitioners present in person.
versus
THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI)
..... Respondent
Through :Ms.Manjeet Arya, APP.Mr.Rahul Tewari, Advocate for R-2along with R-2 present in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG
O R R%08.02.2017
(1)Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferredby the petitioners for quashing of FIR No.142/2012 under Sections498-A/406/34 IPC registered at Police Station Moti Nagar. It is statedthat the matter has been settled with the complainant/victim amicably.(2)Respondent No.2-complainant is present before the Court alongwith her counsel and is identified by him. I have enquired from thecomplainant whether the matter has been settled with the petitionersamicably without fear and pressure. She has informed that the matterhas been settled without any fear or pressure and she has no objectionCRL.M.C. 1262/2016Page 1 of 2
to the quashing of the FIR.Pursuant to the settlementa sum of`20,000/- (in cash) has been handed over to the complainant today inthe court. Statement of the complainant recorded separately. Divorceby mutual consent has been granted.
(3)The petition is supported by the affidavits of the parties.
(4)Since the complainant/Respondent No.2 has voluntarily settledthe dispute with the petitioners, no useful purpose will be served tocontinue with the proceedings. In the interest of justice and to put anend to the litigation and to enable the parties to settle in life afterdivorce,FIRNo.142/2012underSections498-A/406/34IPCregistered at Police Station Moti Nagar and all the proceedingsemanating therefrom are quashed.
(5)The petition is disposed of accordingly.
FEBRUARY 08, 2017/sa
S.P.GARG, J.
-Statement of Respondent No.2Tanvi @ Nidhi,d/o late Sh.Vijay Kumar, on S.A.
I have settled the disputes with the petitioners amicably.Pursuant to the settlement, I have received remaining amount of`20,000/- (in cash) today in the court. I have no objection to thequashing of the FIR No.142/2012 under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPCregistered at Police Station Moti Nagar and all the proceedingsemanating therefrom.
R.O. & A.C.08.02.2017
S.P.GARG(JUDGE)