NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph โ€” Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

BAIL APPLN./797/2017 of JAKIR Vs THE STATE NCT OF DELHI

Court
Delhi High Court
Decision date
2017-09-13
Case number
128 of 2017

Parties

Cites (1)

Statutes cited (2)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Header

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+BAIL APPLN. 797/2017

JAKIR..... PetitionerThrough:Ms.Vandana Singh, Adv.

versus

THE STATE NCT OF DELHI

..... Respondent

Through:Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for StateSI Harender Kumar, PS-Timarpur

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTAO R R%13.09.2017

This is an application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. filed on behalf of thepetitioner for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.128/2017, underSections 308/323/34 IPC, registered at Police Station Timarpur, Delhi.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is aninnocent person and has no nexus with the FIR in question. He furthersubmits that the petitioner has already joined investigation and nothing is tobe recovered at the instance of the petitioner and the petitioner is notrequired for custodial investigation. He further submits that the petitioner isready to join further investigation as and when required and prays that thepetitioner be granted anticipatory bail.

Learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the bail application.However, the learned APP on instructions from the Investigating Officeradmits that the petitioner has joined the investigation.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner isdirected to further join the investigation and in the event of his arrest, he bereleased on bail, on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/-withonesuretyofthelikeamounttothesatisfactionoftheSHO/Investigating officer concerned with the condition that the petitionershall not influence the prosecution witnesses; the petitioner shall not tamperthe prosecution evidence and the petitioner should not leave India withoutprior permission of the Court below.

The present bail application is allowed and disposed of accordingly.Copy of this order be given dasti.

SEPTEMBER 13, 2017/sr

I.S.MEHTA, J