BAIL APPLN./142/2017 of SUNIL TYAGI Vs STATE (GOVT OF NCT DELHI)
Parties
- SUNIL TYAGI (PETITIONER)
- STATE (GOVT OF NCT DELHI (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+BAIL APPLN. 142/2017
SUNIL TYAGI..... Petitioner
Through:Mr. Anil Sehgal, Mr. Om Parkashand Mr. Lalit Khurana, Advs.and Mr. Lalit Khurana, Advs.
versus
STATE (GOVT OF NCT DELHI)..... Respondent
Through:Dr. M.P. Singh, APP with SI VijayKumar, P.S. BurariMr.AtulKumar,Adv.forthecomplainantwithcomplainantinperson.Kumar, P.S. BurariMr.AtulKumar,Adv.forthecomplainantwithcomplainantinperson.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK
O R R%24.01.2017
Crl. M.A. No. 1374/2017
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of.
BAIL APPLN. 142/2017
Notice. Learned APP accepts notice.
It is submitted that complainant and petitioner have settled their
disputes amicably vide Compromise Deed dated 11[th]January, 2017,inasmuch as WP (Crl.) No. 203/2017 has been filed for quashing of the FIR.Complainant is present in Court along with his counsel and admits having
settled the matter.Property disputes arose between the complainant andpetitioner, which led to registration of the present FIR No. 442/2016 under
Sections 420/120-B at Police Station Burari.
Keeping in mind the settlement arrived at between the parties and the
fact that petitioner is on interim bail till 25[th]January, 2017, he is admitted tobail on the same terms and conditions.
Bail application is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti.
JANUARY 24, 2017rb
A.K. PATHAK, J.