NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph — Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

W.P.(C)/1680/2017 of RAMESH KARDAM Vs NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS

Court
Delhi High Court
Decision date
2017-09-26
Case number
1680/2017

Parties

Cites (1)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+W.P.(C) 1680/2017 & CM APPL. 14594/2017RAMESH KARDAM..... Petitioner

..... Petitioner

ThroughMr. Dushyant Yadav, Mr. PradeepSharma and Mr. Puneet Kumar, Advs.Sharma and Mr. Puneet Kumar, Advs.

versus

NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS

..... Respondents

ThroughMr.Manoj Kr.Sharmaand Mr.Gautam Kant Niman, Advs for R-1.Mr. Puneet Singh, Adv for R-2.Gautam Kant Niman, Advs for R-1.Mr. Puneet Singh, Adv for R-2.

Dr. N. Pradeep Sharma and Mr.Pawan Kumar, Advs for the applicant(CM APPL. 14594/17)Pawan Kumar, Advs for the applicant(CM APPL. 14594/17)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA

O R R26.09.2017

By the petition, the petitioner sought directions to therespondent no.1/NDMC to remove the encroachment and illegalconstruction including two rooms and two steel gates at differentplaces of Central Market, Ward-C-68, Ashok Vihar, New Delhi. Inthe status report dated 08.09.2017, in para 3, it is stated, as follows:

“3.That an encroachment removal program was fixed on15.05.17, but the action could not be taken due to nonavailability of police force. Another program was fixed on05.06.17 and during the action, following encroachment wereremoved/demolished with the help of local police:15.05.17, but the action could not be taken due to nonavailability of police force. Another program was fixed on05.06.17 and during the action, following encroachment wereremoved/demolished with the help of local police:

i.Room of size 8.15 x 3.90 m occupied by AshokVihar Trader Association.Vihar Trader Association.

ii.Two steel gates made of M.S. angles structurenear main entrance & near Chabra Sweets. Thephotographsofthedemolitionactionareannexed herewith as Annexure-“A” (Colly).”

In view of the abovesaid action taken, ld. counsel for thepetitioner submits that nothing further survives in the petition.Petition is disposed off accordingly.

A. K. CHAWLA, J

SEPTEMBER 26, 2017ac