NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph โ€” Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

W.P.(C)/2334/2017 of M/S CONCORD ELECTRICAL INDUSTRIES Vs COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX & ANR.

Court
Delhi High Court
Decision date
2017-07-17
Bench
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Case number
2334/2017

Parties

Cites (0 resolved of 1 detected)

1 case citation detected in this judgment's own text, but none resolved to a judgment page in this build yet.

Statutes cited (1)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2334/2017

M/S CONCORD ELECTRICAL INDUSTRIES

..... Petitioner

Through:

Mr. A.K. Babbar, Mr. Surinder Kumar, Mr. Atul Babbar, Ms Amita Babbar and Mr. Bharat Tripathi, Advocates

versus

COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX & ANR.

..... Respondents

Through: Mr Satyakam, ASC for VAT with Ms. Rajni Vashisht, LA, VAT Dept.

CORAM:JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR O R R% 19.04.2017

1. It is stated that the refund order dated 13[th] April, 2017 has been passed. copy of the order has been handed over to learned counsel for the Petitioner. It is further stated by the learned counsel for the Respondent that the interest amount thereof shall be credited in the account of the Petitioner not later than one week from today. In the event of denial of the interest amount by the Respondent, the reasons thereof will be furnished to the Petitioner not later than one week from today.

2. It is open to the Petitioner to make representation to the VATO concerned within one week thereof and such representation /objection shall be decided within month. W.P.(C) 2334/2017 Page 1 of 2

3. If any further grievance survives, it is open to the Petitioner to take appropriate steps in accordance with law.

4. The petition is disposed of in the above terms.

S.MURALIDHAR, J

APRIL 19, 2017 SU

CHANDER SHEKHAR, J

W.P.(C) 2334/2017