NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph โ€” Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

CRL.M.C./2386/2016 of MOHD. WARIS KHAN & ORS Vs THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR

Court
Delhi High Court
Decision date
2017-09-13
Case number
2386/2016

Parties

Cites (1)

Statutes cited (1)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 2386/2016

MOHD. WARIS KHAN & ORS

..... Petitioners

Through : Mr. Neerad Pandey, Adv.

versus

THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.... Respondents Through :Mr. G.M. Farooqui, APP with SI Shah Faisal Khan, P.S. Sunlight Colony for the State Respondent no. 2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R R% 13.09.2017

Petitioner no. 3 is stated to have died. Petitioner nos. 2 to 5 are relatives of the petitioner no. 1. Respondent no. 2 is wife of petitioner no. 1. Disputes arose between them, which led to registration of the cross FIRs, being FIR no. 7/2013 and FIR No. 8/2013 under Sections 323/354/34 IPC, both registered at Police Station Sunlight Colony, New Delhi. It is submitted that petitioner no. 1and respondent no.2 have settled their disputes amicably before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre vide Settlement Agreement dated 5[th] July, 2014, copy whereof has been placed on record. Respondent no. 2 is present in Court and has been

identified by SI Shah Faisal Khan, P.S. Sunlight Colony. Respondent no. 2 admits having settled the matter with the petitioners of her own free will, voluntarily and without any undue force, pressure or coercion. Respondent no. 2 submits that she is not willing to pursue the FIR any further and the same may be quashed.

Keeping in mind the settlement arrived at between the parties, in the interest of justice, FIR No. 8/2013 under Sections 323/354/34 IPC registered at Police Station Sunlight Colony and the consequent proceedings emanating

therefrom against any of the petitioners, are quashed.

Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti.

SEPTEMBER 13, 2017 rb

A.K. PATHAK, J.