NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph — Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

BAIL APPLN./2549/2016 of MONU Vs STATE (NCT DELHI)

Court
Delhi High Court
Decision date
2017-09-27
Case number
246 of 2016

Parties

Cites (1)

Statutes cited (3)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+BAIL APPLN. 2549/2016MONU

..... Petitioner

Through:Mr.R.P.Singh, Advocate.versus

STATE (NCT DELHI)

..... Respondent

Through:Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for Statewith SI Rahul Kumar, P.S. GTBEnclave, Delhi.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTAO R R19.07.2017

This is an application under Section 439 read with Section 482Cr.P.C. filed on behalf of the petitioner for grant of bail in case FIRNo.246/2016, under Sections 394/397/411/34 IPC and Section 25 of ArmsAct registered at Police Station G.T.B Enclave, Delhi.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner isan innocent person and the allegations as alleged in the FIR are false andbaseless. Counsel further submits that there is no evidence to connect thepetitioner with the commission of the alleged offence and the petitioner is injudicial custody since 14[th]June, 2016 and further submits that no purposewould be served if the petitioner is kept in judicial custody for furtherindefinite period and prays that the petitioner may be released on bail.

On the other hand, learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the

bail application and submitted that the petitioner was caught red handedalong with knife. He further submits that the petitioner is wanted in sevenother cases and the complainant has already examined in the Trial Court.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

Considering the facts and circumstances, since the petitioner is injudicial custody since 14[th]June, 2016 and the trial is likely to take sometime, I deem it appropriate to release the petitioner on regular bail.Accordingly, the petitioner is admitted to bail, on his furnishing bail bond inthe sum of Rs.10,000/- with one surety of the like amount, to the satisfactionof the concerned Metropolitan Magistrate.

The present bail application is allowed and stands disposed of in the

above terms.

Copy of this order be given dasti, as prayed.

I.S.MEHTA, J

JULY 19, 2017