W.P.(C)/3636/2003 of CAPT. SURESH KUMAR Vs UOI & ANR.

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2017-03-20
Case number: 3636/2003

Parties

CAPT. SURESH KUMAR (PETITIONER)
UOI & ANR (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1)

W.P.(C)/2420/2007 of HEMI Vs UOI & ORS. (2008)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

$~R-32*INTHEHIGHCOURTOFDELHIATNEWDELHI+W.P.(C) 3636/2003

CAPT. SURESH KUMAR

..... Petitioner

Through:Mr. Rakesh Khanna and Mr. Udit Kr.Chaturvedi, Advs.

versus

UOI & ANR.

..... RespondentsThrough:Ms. Suruchi Suri, Adv. for R-2.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTAO R R%20.03.2017

1.Counsels for the parties state that the issues which are subject matterof the present writ petition were also the issues in the case of A.K.Dewan(Capt.) Vs. Union of India & Anr. 221(2015) DLT 133, and therefore, thiswrit petition also will stand dismissed by adopting the discussion and ratioof the judgment in the case of A.K.Dewan (supra).Also, I may note thatthe judgment in the case of A.K.Dewan (supra) has been challenged beforethe Division Bench of this Court in an LPA and which is stated to bepending.

2.In any case, since the issue is covered matter against the petitioner,

in view of the judgment in the case of A.K.Dewan (supra), accordingly thiswrit petition will stand dismissed by mutatis mutandis applying thediscussion and ratio of the judgment in the case of A.K.Dewan (supra).

MARCH 20, 2017ib

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J