NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph โ€” Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

CRL.M.C./3656/2016 of HASEEN AHMED (MUNNA ) & ORS. Vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

Court
Delhi High Court
Decision date
2017-08-30
Bench
A K PATHAK
Case number
3656/2016

Parties

Cites (1 resolved of 2 detected)

Statutes cited (1)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Header

Signed By:RAM DATTSigning Date:09.10.2024 15:47Certify that the digital and physical file havebeen compared and the digital data is as perthe physical file and no page is missing.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 3656/2016

Petitioners

HASEEN AHMED (MUNNA ) & ORS.

Through : Mr. Mobin Akhtar, Adv.

versus

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents

Through :Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP with Inspector Sanjeev Kumar, SHO, SI Babu Lal and ASI Joginder, P.S. Jamia Nagar for the State Respondent no. 2 in person.

AND

+ W.P. (CRL.) 2418 /2017 & CRL.M.A. 14107/2017 AMIR & ORS.

.... Petitioners

Through Mr. Mobin Akhtar, Adv.

versus

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. [.....Respondents ]Through Ms. Megha Bahi, Adv. for Mr. Avi Singh, ASC with Inspector Sanjeev Kumar, SHO, SI Babu Lal and ASI Joginder, P.S. Jamia Nagar for the State Mr. Noor Alam, Adv. for respondent nos. 2 with father of respondent no. 2

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

ORDER % 30.08.2017

Petitioners (accused) and private respondent Danish (represented

through his father Shri Haseen Ahmad) and Mohd. Shahid (represented through his brother Mohd. Amir) are stated to have settled their disputes amicably. It is prayed that two cross FIRs may be quashed, details whereof are as under:-

FIR No. 737/2016 under Sections 323/324/341/451/506/34 IPC registered at P.S. Jamia Nagar on the complaint of Mohd. Danish (respondent no. 2), complainant in W.P. (Cr!.) No. 2418/2017.

FIR No. 691/2016 under Sections 323/308/451/34 IPC registered at P.S. Jamia Nagar on the complaint of Mohd. Shahid (respondent no. 3), complainant in Cr!. M.C. No. 3656/20 16.

Shri Haseen Ahmad and Mohd. Amir are present in Court along with their respective counsels and have been identified by SI Babu La!, PS. Jamia Nagar. They submit that the matter has been settled, inasmuch as, the settlement has been arrived at without any undue force, pressure or coercion exerted by the petitioners. Memorandums of Understanding dated [1St ] March, 2017 and [251h ] September, 2016 respectively have been placed on record and have been admitted as correct. It is submitted that abovementioned FIRs may be quashed, in view of the settlement.

Keeping in view the settlement arrived at between the accused

persons and the complainant/injured, who are neighbours, in the interest of justice both the FIRs, that is, FIR No. 737/2016 under Sections 323/324/341/451/506/34 IPC and FIR No. 691/2016 under Sections 323/308/451/34 IPC, both registered at P.S. Jamia Nagar and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. Faheem Ahmad is stated to be in judicial custody in this case. He be released from jail, if not required in any other case.

Both the petitions are disposed of in the above terms. Miscellaneous application is disposed of as infructuous. Dasti.

AUGUST 30, 2017 rb

A.K. PATHAK, J.