NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph — Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

BAIL APPLN./354/2017 of AMRITA KAUR Vs STATE

Court
Delhi High Court
Decision date
2017-12-13
Bench
AGAINST RESPONDENT, ARJUN MARG DLF CITY, CITY CENTRE-IIOPP JANTAR MANTAR, ENGINEERING SERVICES LTD, FIRST FLOOR, GURGAON, GURGAON HARYANA, HARYANA, JAI SINGH ROAD, ORGANIZING COMMITTEE, PHASE-I, SHOPPING MALL, THROUGH CHAIRMAN
Case number
4 of 2017

Parties

Statutes cited (2)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Conclusion

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+BAIL APPLN. 354/2017AMRITA KAUR..... PetitionerThrough:Mr. Puneet Ahluwalia, Adv.versus

STATE..... RespondentThrough:Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for theState with SI Krishan Kumar, P.S.Kalkaji.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAKO R R%03.03.2017

Petitioner was granted interim bail for four weeks since her child, whowas suffering from Autism, was seriously ill. By this application, petitionerseeks extension of interim bail on the ground that petitioner’s three year oldson is still in the hospital where his endoscopy has been done. Certificate ofDr. Preet Singh Chawla of Chawla Nursing Home dated 23[rd]February, 2017reflects that biopsy result was inconclusive as tissue was insufficient. It issubmitted that repeat biopsy is required.

Learned APP for the State submits that SI Krishan Pal of policestation Kalkaji has already verified the facts and the petitioner’s child hasfound hospitalised.

Accordingly, interim bail of the petitioner is extended for another four

weeks from the date of expiry of earlier bail on the same terms andconditions as stipulated in the order dated 6[th]January, 2017 passed in Bail

Application No. 4/2017.

Application is disposed of.

Dasti.

MARCH 03, 2017

A.K. PATHAK, J.