NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph โ€” Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

CRL.M.C./4800/2017 of SUBHASH SINGH RAWAL Vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR

Court
Delhi High Court
Decision date
2017-11-21
Case number
4800/2017

Parties

Cites (1)

Statutes cited (1)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Header

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+CRL.M.C. 4800/2017 & Crl. M.A. no. 19140/2017

SUBHASH SINGH RAWAL..... PetitionerThroughMr. Mr. Arvind Kumar Jha, Adv.ThroughMr. Mr. Arvind Kumar Jha, Adv.

versus

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR..... RespondentThroughMs. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP withSI Rahul Kumar, P.S. Kalkaniforrespondent no. 1Respondent no. 2 in personThroughMs. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP withSI Rahul Kumar, P.S. Kalkaniforrespondent no. 1Respondent no. 2 in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R R%21.11.2017

Respondent no. 2 Smt. Santosh is present in the Court and has been

identified by SI Rahul Kumar of Police Station Kalkaji. It is submitted thatpetitioners and respondent no. 2 are neighbours and known to each other forthe last 20 years.It is further submitted that matter has been settledamicably between the petitioners and respondent no. 2; therefore, FIRNo.183/2016 under Sections 323/354/509 IPC registered at Police StationKalkaji on the complaint of respondent no. 2, may be quashed. Respondentno. 2 submits that she has settled the matter with the petitioners of her ownfree will and without any undue force, pressure or coercion before the

Mediation Centre, Saket Courts, New Delhi on 3[rd]July, 2017. She furthersubmits that she has received the entire settled amount and is not willing topursue the FIR any further and the same may be quashed.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case as detailedabove, in the interest of justice, FIR No. 183/2016 under Sections323/354/509 IPC registered at Police Station Kalkaji and the consequentproceedings emanating thereform are quashed.

Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Miscellaneous applicationis disposed of as infructuous. Dasti.

NOVEMBER 21, 2017

r.bararia

A.K. PATHAK, J.