BAIL APPLN./880/2017 of AAMIR Vs THE STATE NCT OF DELHI

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2017-11-22
Case number: 601 of 2016

Parties

AAMIR (PETITIONER)
THE STATE NCT OF DELHI (RESPONDENT)

Cites (0 resolved of 1 detected)

1 case citation detected in this judgment's own text, but none resolved to a judgment page in this build yet.

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+BAIL APPLN. 880/2017

AAMIR..... PetitionerThrough:Mr.M.L. Yadav, Adv.

versus

THE STATE NCT OF DELHI

..... Respondent

Through:Mr. Ashish Dutta, APP.SI Omveer Singh, P.S. Nang Nagri

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMARO R R%10.07.2017

Crl.M.A._______/2017

Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.

Application stands disposed of.

BAIL APPLN. 880/2017 & Crl.M.B.1157/2017

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with FIR No.601/2016 dated19.07.2016 (P.S. Nand Nagri) instituted for offences under Sections307/427/34 of the IPC.

The petitioner has been named in the FIR along with others for havingassaulted the victim/informant in the occurrence. After the assault, firingwas resorted to, leading to the injuries in the elbow of the victim. Whilenarrating the sequence of events, the victim did not state categorically thatthe petitioner had opened fire. It was only later, that such statement wasgiven by the informant.

The FIR reveals that the petitioner was named by the victim in thefirst instance but without any specific overt act.

The petitioner is in custody since 09.09.2016.

Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and the period of custodyof the petitioner, this court is inclined to release the petitioner on bail.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on his furnishing bond in thesum of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction ofthe Trial Court.

It is, however, made clear that if at all the petitioner would involvehimself in any other unlawful activity, it would be open for the State toapply for cancellation of his bail.

The petition is disposed of.

Dasti.

ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J

JULY 10, 2017