CM(M)/745/2017 of RASHEEDA SIDDIQI & ANR Vs MUSTAFA ALEEM SIDDIQUI & ANR
Parties
- End of picture text -----<br> (PETITIONER)
- MUSTAFA ALEEM SIDDIQUI & ANR (RESPONDENT)
Cites (0 resolved of 1 detected)
1 case citation detected in this judgment's own text, but none resolved to a judgment page in this build yet.
Statutes cited (2)
- constitution of india, article-227 (1950)
- constitution of india (1950)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) No.745/2017 RASHEEDA SIDDIQI & ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Y.P. Narula, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Abhey Narula and Ms. Tara Narula, Advs.
versus
MUSTAFA ALEEM SIDDIQUI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW O R R% 21.07.2017
CM No.25599/2017 and CM No.25600/2017 (both for exemption).
1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. 2. The CMs stand disposed of. 2. The CMs stand disposed of.
CM(M) No.745/2017.
3. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order dated 17[th] May, 2017 in CS No.7902/16 of the Court of Additional District Judge-06 (South-East), Saket Courts, New Delhi.
4. The senior counsel for the petitioners / plaintiffs has argued (i) that the suit from which this petition arises is of the year 2008; (ii) that it has been at the stage of final arguments since the year 2014; (iii) that totally misconceived applications were filed before the Additional District Judge and the learned Additional District Judge, instead of dismissing the said applications at the threshold and proceeding with the final arguments has posted the matter to 14[th] September, 2017 for filing of reply to the applications and for arguments thereon. Attention is also invited to the order
CM(M) No.745/2017
page 1 of 2
dated 15[th] March, 2016 in FAO(OS) No.47/2015 arising from the suit and it is argued that the Division Bench of this Court has also dismissed the misconceived appeals and the said order was confirmed by the Supreme Court.
5. This petition is disposed of with request to the learned Additional District Judge to, on 14[th] September, 2017 or within one week therefrom definitely decide the applications which have been filed (as noted in order dated 17[th] May, 2017) and to thereafter also expedite the proceedings in the suit having regard to the fact that it is of 2008 vintage
No costs.
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J
JULY 21, 2017 ‘pp’..
CM(M) No.745/2017
page 2 of 2