CRL.M.C./789/2017 of SHYAM Vs STATE OF DELHI & ANR
Parties
- SHYAM (PETITIONER)
- STATE OF DELHI & ANR (RESPONDENT)
Cited by (4)
Counts citations resolved within this build's own ingested judgment corpus. The true corpus-wide count will be higher until more of the corpus is ingested.
Statutes cited (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+CRL.M.C. 789/2017
SHYAM
..... Petitioner
Through :Mr.R.K.Gupta, Advocate along withpetitioner in person.petitioner in person.
versus
STATE OF DELHI & ANR..... RespondentsThrough :Mr.Kamal K.Ghei, APP with SIPancham Kumar, PS Saket.Mr.Arnav Vidyarthi, Advocate forR2 / BSES.Through :Mr.Kamal K.Ghei, APP with SIPancham Kumar, PS Saket.Mr.Arnav Vidyarthi, Advocate forR2 / BSES.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARGO R R%27.02.2017
CRL.M.A.No.3345/2017 (Exemption)
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed of.
CRL.M.C. 789/2017
(1)Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferredby the petitioner for quashing of FIR No.881/2015 under Section 135Electricity Act, 2003 registered at Police Station Saket. It is statedthat the matter has been settled with the complainant/respondent No.2amicably.
(2)Learned counsel for respondent No.2 / BSES Rajdhani PowerCRL.M.C. 789/2017page 1 of 2
Ltd. is present before the Court and informs that the petitioner haspaid his all dues and respondent No.2 / BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd.has no objection to the quashing of the FIR.
(3)The petition is supported by the affidavit of the petitioner & nodues certificate issued by respondent No.2/ BSES Rajdhani PowerLtd.
(4)Since the matter has been settled between the parties amicablyand the entire dues have been paid, no useful purpose will be servedto continue with the proceedings. In the interest of justice and to putan end to the litigation, FIR No.881/2015 under Section 135Electricity Act, 2003 registered at Police Station Saket and all theproceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
(5)The petitioner is, however, burdened with costs of `20,000/- tobe deposited with Prime Minister Relief Fund within month. TheRegistry shall ensure the compliance of the order.
(6)The petition is disposed of accordingly.
FEBRUARY 27, 2017 / tr
S.P.GARG, J
CRL.M.C. 789/2017