W.P.(CRL)/1244/2017 of SUNIL @ NATA Vs THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
Parties
- SUNIL @ NATA (PETITIONER)
- THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1)
Statutes cited (3)
- code of criminal procedure, 482 (1973)
- constitution of india, 482 (1950)
- constitution of india, article-226 (1950)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+W.P.(CRL) 1244/2017
SUNIL @ NATA..... PetitionerThrough:Ms.Sunita Arora, Adv.
versus
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
..... Respondent
Through:Mr.Piyush Singhal, Adv. forMr.Ashish Aggarwal, ASC for State
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTAO R R%11.05.2017
Vide this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India readwith Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner seeks parole for period of threemonths in order to enable him to search suitable life partner for himselfand to re-establish social ties with the society and his family.
It is submitted by the counsel appearing on behalf of the State that thepetitioner is not entitled for parole due to unsatisfactory jail conduct.
Status report perused.
The present petition is without any merit. I do not find it fit case togrant parole to the petitioner. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissedand disposed of accordingly.
MAY 11, 2017/radhika
I.S.MEHTA, J