W.P.(CRL)/2857/2017 of ANIL Vs THE STATE NCT OF DELHI

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2017-10-13
Bench: THENATIONAL CAPITAL REGION OF DELHI

Parties

ANIL (PETITIONER)
THE STATE NCT OF DELHI (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1)

BAIL APPLN./1697/2020 of SHAHJADA IRFAN Vs THE STATE NCT OF DELHI (2020)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Header

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+W.P.(CRL) 2857/2017

ANIL..... Petitioner

Through: Ms.Nikita Sharma, Adv.

versus

THE STATE NCT OF DELHI..... Respondent

Through: Mr.Sanjay Lao, ASCS.I.Dinesh , P.S. Palam Airport.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMARO R R13.10.2017

The petitioner has sought parole for performing the last rites ofhis father who died on 24.9.2017.

This Court had asked Mr.Sanjay Lao, learned ASC to verify theassertion of the petitioner. Mr.Lao submits that the fact of death of thefather of the petitioner has been verified and has been found to be true.

Though the petitioner has availed of three weeks of furloughfrom 19.7.2017 to 10.8.2017, but considering the fact that thepetitioner has to perform the last rites of his father, this Court isinclined to release him on parole for period of fifteen days.

The petitioner is directed to be released on parole for period offifteen days, to be counted from the date of his release, on hisfurnishing bond in the sum of Rs. 5,000/- with one surety in the likeamount to the satisfaction of the Superintendent of the concerned jail.

The petitioner shall, however, abide by the conditions listed

below :-

a) The petitioner shall surrender before the jail authorities on orbefore the expiry of the said period of parole.before the expiry of the said period of parole.

b) The petitioner shall not engage himself in any unlawfulactivity.activity.

c) The petitioner would not leave, under any circumstance, theNational Capital Region of Delhi, without intimating theofficer-in-charge of the concerned police station.National Capital Region of Delhi, without intimating theofficer-in-charge of the concerned police station.

d) He shall furnish his and the surety’s mobile telephonenumbers to the SHO of the concerned police station so thatin case of necessity, he could be tracked and his whereaboutscould be ascertained.numbers to the SHO of the concerned police station so thatin case of necessity, he could be tracked and his whereaboutscould be ascertained.

In case, the petitioner flouts any one of the conditions, anapplication could be moved by the SHO for cancellation of his paroleand for taking of coercive steps for securing his attendance.

With these observations, the petition is disposed of.

The order be communicated to the Superintendent of theconcerned jail for compliance and record.

OCTOBER 13, 2017Bisht

ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J