W.P.(CRL)/1678/2017 of PURUSHOTTAM GOYEL Vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+W.P.(CRL) 1678/2017PURUSHOTTAM GOYEL..... Petitioner

..... Petitioner

ThroughMr.Prashant Mehta, Adv. withMr.Alok Tripathi, Adv.

versus

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI..... Respondent

ThroughMs.Nandita Rao, ASC with Mr.Archit Vashistha & Ms.Srilina Roy,Advs.SI Lalit Kumar PS I.P. Estate.Archit Vashistha & Ms.Srilina Roy,Advs.SI Lalit Kumar PS I.P. Estate.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMARO R R%31.05.2017

Crl.M.A. 9303/2017

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

The application stands disposed of.

W.P.(Crl.) 1678/2017

The petitioner has sought protection from the police because heapprehends disturbance at the youth centre. It has been submitted that oneSmt.Indira Mayaram has been threatening to dispossess him from the officeat Jawahar Lal Nehru Youth Centre, Delhi.

The status report has been filed by Ms.Nandita Rao, learned ASCwhich is taken on record.

The status report reveals that on the asking of the petitioner, an

arrangement has been made whereby patrolling staff, beat staff and Divisionofficer have been instructed to keep close watch of the area so as to ensurethat no one takes law into his own hands.

The petitioner has also been provided with the mobile telephonenumber of the SHO of the concerned police station with an assurance thatwhenever any distress call would be made by the petitioner, the same wouldbe responded promptly.The mobile telephone numbers of other policeofficers including the beat staff will also be provided to the petitioner for theneedful.

In view of the action already taken by the respondent/police and the

assurance given by the officer incharge of the concerned police station ofproviding all protection to the petitioner, no further order need be passed.The petition is disposed of.

MAY 31, 2017ab

ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J