NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph — Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

W.P.(CRL)/2177/2017 of AZIM KHAN Vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

Court
Delhi High Court
Decision date
2017-11-02
Bench
THENATIONAL CAPITAL REGION OF DELHI

Parties

Cites (1)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Header

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+W.P.(CRL) 2177/2017

AZIM KHAN

..... PetitionerThrough:Mr.M.K.Mishra, Adv.

versus

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI..... Respondent

Through:Mr.Sanjay Lao, ASC.SI Vijay, P.S.Burari.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR

O R R%02.11.2017

Crl.M.A.14914/2017 (preponement)

For the reasons stated in the application, the prayer for giving an earlyhearing to W.P(Crl) 2177/2017 is allowed.

The writ petition shall be heard today.

The earlier date of 01.12.2017 is hereby cancelled.

W.P.(CRL) 2177/2017

The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 05.06.2017 passed bythe competent authority whereby his request for being released on parole forgetting his daughter admitted in private school and for re-establishingsocial ties has been rejected on the ground that minimum of six months hadnot elapsed by that time from the date of termination of the previous parolewhich was from 27.01.2017 to 27.02.2017.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that now more than

six months have passed after the end of the period of parole referred toabove. It has also been pointed out from the nominal roll that the petitionerby now has remained in jail for about five years and has shown goodconduct except for one occasion when he surrendered four days late after theexpiry of the period of parole granted by this Court.

It further appears that except for 10 days of interim bail in the year2015 and parole for one month from 27.01.2017 to 27.02.2017, thepetitioner has not been released from jail either on furlough or parole.

Taking into account the period of confinement of the petitioner incustody, this Court is inclined to release him on parole for period of fourweeks.

The petitioner is directed to be released on parole for period of fourweeks, to be counted from the date of his release, on his furnishing bond inthe sum of Rs.5,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfactionof the Superintendent of the concerned jail.

The petitioner shall, however, abide by the conditions listed below:-

a) The petitioner shall surrender before the jail authorities on orbefore the expiry of the said period of parole.before the expiry of the said period of parole.

b) The petitioner shall not engage himself in any unlawful activity.

c) The petitioner would not leave, under any circumstance, theNational Capital Region of Delhi, without intimating the officer-in-charge of the concerned police station.National Capital Region of Delhi, without intimating the officer-in-charge of the concerned police station.

d) He shall furnish his and his sureties’ mobile telephone numbers tothe SHO of the concerned police station so that in case of necessityhe could be tracked and his whereabouts could be ascertained.the SHO of the concerned police station so that in case of necessityhe could be tracked and his whereabouts could be ascertained.

In case, the petitioner flouts any one of the conditions, an applicationcould be moved by the SHO for cancellation of his parole and for taking ofcoercive steps for securing his attendance.

With these observations, the petition is disposed of.

The order be communicated to the Superintendent of the concernedjail for compliance and record.

NOVEMBER 02, 2017

ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J