NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph — Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

BAIL APPLN./1056/2018 of SURINDER ARORA Vs STATE

Court
Delhi High Court
Decision date
2018-11-26
Bench
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Case number
108 of 2018

Parties

Cites (0 resolved of 1 detected)

1 case citation detected in this judgment's own text, but none resolved to a judgment page in this build yet.

Statutes cited (1)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Arguments

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

% Judgment delivered on: 26.11.2018

+ BAIL APPLN. 1056/2018 & Crl.M.B.757/2018 SURINDER ARORA

..... Petitioner

versus

STATE ..... Respondent

Advocates who appeared in this case:For the Petitioner : Mr.Vikas Aggarwal and Mr.Anshu Mahajan, Adv.

For the Respondent: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State with SI Rawat Singh, P.S.Tilak Nagar Mr.Rohit Oberoi, Adv. for R-2.

CORAM:-

HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT 26.11.2018

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

1.Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.108/2018 under Section 498A/406/34 IPC, Police Station Tilak Nagar.

2.Subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord. By order dated 08.05.2018 petitioner was granted interim protection subject to petitioner joining investigation.

3.Learned APP under instructions from the Investigating Officer submits that investigation is complete and the charge sheet is in the

process of being finalised for being filed in Court.

4.Without commenting on the merits of the case, and on perusal of the records, I am satisfied that the petitioner has made out case for grant of anticipatory bail.

5.Accordingly, it is directed that in the event of arrest, the arresting officer/IO/SHO shall release the petitioner on bail on his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs. 15,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/Investigating Officer/SHO concerned. Petitioner shall not do anything that may prejudice either the trial or the prosecution witnesses.

6.The petition is disposed of in the above terms.

7.Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master.

NOVEMBER 26, 2018

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J