CRL.M.C./1128/2018 of RAVI & ORS Vs THE STATE & ORS
Parties
- RAVI & ORS (PETITIONER)
- THE STATE & ORS (RESPONDENT)
Cited by (1)
Counts citations resolved within this build's own ingested judgment corpus. The true corpus-wide count will be higher until more of the corpus is ingested.
Cites (0 resolved of 1 detected)
1 case citation detected in this judgment's own text, but none resolved to a judgment page in this build yet.
Statutes cited (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+CRL.M.C. 1128/2018
RAVI & ORS
..... Petitioner
Through:Ms. Tanu Gaur, Adv.
versus
THE STATE & ORS
..... Respondents
Through:Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Addl. PP for theState with IOMr. Nikhil Rastogi, Adv. for R-2 to 5
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVAO R R%05.03.2018
Crl. M.A. 4078/2018 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
CRL.M.C. 1128/2018
1.The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 316 of 2017 underSections 308/323/341/34 of the IPC Police Station Swaroop Nagar, NewDelhi, based on settlement.
2.The parties are neighbours and the subject FIR emanates out of aminor quarrel which happened between the parties on account of burstingcrackers on the occasion of Deewali. The petitioners have paid sum of Rs.20,000/- by way of Cheque Nos. 528754, 528755, 528756 & 528757 alldated 05.03.2018 in the sum of Rs. 5000/- each favouring respondent nos. 2to 5 as compensation for the injuries sustained by them.
3.Respondent no. 2 to 5 are present in person in Court today,represented by their counsels and are identified by the InvestigatingOfficer. They submit that they have settled their disputes with theintervention of locals and respectable people of the locality. They furthersubmit that they do not wish to press the criminal complaints against thepetitioners any further.
4.In view of the fact that the disputes between the parties has beensettled, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futilityand justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put toan end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimateguiding factor. It would also be expedient to quash the subject FIRs and theconsequent proceedings emanating therefrom.
5.In view of the above, the petition is allowed. FIR No. 316 of 2017under Sections 308/323/341/34 of the IPC Police Station Swaroop Nagar,New Delhi and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are,accordingly quashed.
6.Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master.
MARCH 05, 2018‘rs’
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J