NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph — Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

W.P.(CRL)/328/2018 of RAVINDER SINGH Vs STATE

Court
Delhi High Court
Decision date
2018-10-09
Case number
1214/2018

Parties

Cites (0 resolved of 1 detected)

1 case citation detected in this judgment's own text, but none resolved to a judgment page in this build yet.

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 328/2018 RAVINDER SINGH ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Nitish Chaudhary, Adv. for Mr. Chetan Lokur, Adv. DHCLSC.

versus

STATE

..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. R.S. Kundu, ASC with Ms. Suman Sharma, Mr. Bhagat Singh, Advs. with SI Sunder Singh PS Baba Haridas Nagar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

O R R% 10.04.2018

By this petition the petitioner seeks parole on the ground that he has to file Special Leave Petition.

Learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State submits that special leave petition on behalf of the petitioner being SLP No. 1214/2018 has already been filed and notice in the same has been issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court. The next date before the Hon’ble Supreme Court is 27[th]April, 2018.

Be that as it may, the petitioner has been in continuous custody since the date of his arrest i.e. from 1[st] October, 2012 except for an interim bail for period of 10 days with effect from 11[th] May, 2016 by this Court when he surrendered in time and did not misuse the concession.

W.P.(CRL) 328/2018

page 1 of 2

Considering the fact that the petitioner has been in continuous incarceration for nearly more than 5 years, this Court deems it fit to grant parole to the petitioner. It is therefore directed that the petitioner be released on parole for period of four weeks on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of ₹25,000/- with one surety bond of the like amount subject to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court/ CMM concerned. During the period of parole the petitioner will reside with his parents only at village Jatola, Distt. Palwal Haryana and will not approach his wife or the two daughters at New Heera Park, Najafgarh, New Delhi who are living in rented accommodation. The petitioner will also report to SHO Palwal during the period of release on every Monday at 4.00 PM.

Petition is disposed of.

Copy of this order be communicated to the petitioner through Superintendent Tihar Jail.

APRIL 10, 2018 ‘ga’

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

W.P.(CRL) 328/2018