NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph โ€” Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

CRL.M.C./270/2018 of SAURABH KWATRA & ORS Vs THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR

Court
Delhi High Court
Decision date
2018-02-16
Case number
270/2018

Parties

Cites (0 resolved of 1 detected)

1 case citation detected in this judgment's own text, but none resolved to a judgment page in this build yet.

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Header

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+CRL.M.C. 270/2018SAURABH KWATRA & ORS..... PetitionersSAURABH KWATRA & ORS..... Petitioners

Through:Mr. Bhupinder Mehtani, Mr. AshokK. Bhardwaj and Mr. Vineet K.Tuteja, Advs.K. Bhardwaj and Mr. Vineet K.Tuteja, Advs.

versus

THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR..... RespondentsThrough:Dr. M.P. Singh, APP with ASI AmanKumar, P.S. Nanak Pura.Through:Dr. M.P. Singh, APP with ASI AmanKumar, P.S. Nanak Pura.

Mr. Sahil, Adv. for R-2 along with R-2 in person.2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAKO R R%18.01.2018

Respondent no.2 is present in Court along with her counsel and hasbeen identified by ASI Aman Kumar of Crime (Women) Cell, Nanak Pura.Respondent no.2 submits that she has settled the matter with the petitionerno.1before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi on 1[st]February, 2017 of her own free will and without any undue force, pressureor coercion. She further submits that her marriage with petitioner no.1 hasalready been dissolved by the decree of divorce by mutual consent by theFamily Court, Shahdara, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi on 21[st]November,2017. Petitioner no. 1 has paid ` 8.50 lacs to the respondent no.2 today inCourt vide two demand drafts, photocopy whereof has been placed on

record. Respondent no.2 says that entire settled amount of `22 lacs standspaid with this payment and she has no objection in case the FIR is quashedagainst the petitioner no.1 and his relatives, that is, petitioner nos. 2 to 7.

Keeping in mind that petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 have settledtheir disputes amicably, in the interest of justice, FIR No. 33/2016 underSections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at police station Crime (Women) Cell,

Nanak Pura and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom arequashed.

Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Miscellaneous applicationis disposed of as infructuous.

Dasti.

JANUARY 18, 2018ga

A.K. PATHAK, J.