NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph โ€” Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

W.P.(C)/2809/2018 of HIMMAT SINGH Vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS

Court
Delhi High Court
Decision date
2018-05-23
Case number
2809/2018

Parties

Cites (1)

Statutes cited (1)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Conclusion

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 2809/2018

HIMMAT SINGH

..... Petitioner

Through: Ms. Puja Dewan Seth, Adv.

versus

UNION OF INDIA & ORS

Through:

..... Respondents

Mr. Vikas Mahajan, CGSC.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER

O R R% 27.04.2018 CM Appl No.17058/2018

1. Issue notice.

2. Mr. Vikas Mahajan, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of

the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the writ petitions

numbers are wrongly given. Correct numbers of the writ petitions are as follows:

(i) WP(C) No.2592/2018

(ii) WP(C) No.2809/2018

4. The said statement is taken on record.

5. Learned counsel states that he does not oppose the prayer made

in the application. The prayers made in the application reads as follows:-

a. the condone the delay of 18 days', in compliance of the order

dated 22.03.2018 passed in writ petition no. WP(C) No.2592/2018 same as writ petition no. WP(C) No. 2592/2018.

b. to treat the compliance carried out in writ petition no. WP(C)No. 2592/2018 same as writ petition no. WP(C) No.2592/2018 since both Petitioners in both the writ petitions are directors of same company i.e. Indopods Design Private Limited".

6. For the reasons given therein, the prayers are allowed. The petitioner will comply with the directions given in the order dated 22[nd] March, 2018 latest by 15[th] May, 2018.

7. The application is disposed of accordingly.

APRIL 27, 2018/ak

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J