CRL.M.C./290/2018 of AJAY YADAV & ANR Vs THE STATE & ANR

*INTHEHIGHCOURTOFDELHIATNEWDELHI+CRL.M.C. 290/2018 & Crl. M.A. no. 1117/2018

AJAY YADAV & ANR..... Petitioners

ThroughMr. Paveen Dabas, Adv.

versus

THE STATE & ANR..... RespondentsThroughMr.M.S.Oberoi,APPwithSISurender,P.S.Begumpurforrespondent no. 1Mr.SachinChhokar,Adv.withrespondent no. 2 in personThroughMr.M.S.Oberoi,APPwithSISurender,P.S.Begumpurforrespondent no. 1Mr.SachinChhokar,Adv.withrespondent no. 2 in person

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R R%19.01.2018

Respondent no. 2 Ms. Jyoti Yadav is present along with her counseland has been identified by SI Surender of Police Station Begumpur.Respondent no. 2 submits that she has settled the matter with the petitionerno. 1 of her own free will and without any undue force, pressure or coercion,before the Mediation Centre. Rohini Courts, Delhi on 19[th]May, 2017.Respondent no. 2 says that her marriage with petitioner no. 1 has alreadybeen dissolved by decree of divorce by mutual consent on 29[th]November,2017 passed by the Family Courts, North-West District, Rohini Courts,Delhi.Petitioner has paid `2,00,000/- to the respondent no. 2 towards the

balance settled amount, vide demand draft, photocopy whereof has beenplaced on record.Respondent no. 2 submits that entire settled amount of`6,00,000/- stands paid with this payment.Respondent no. 2 submits that

she has no objection in case FIR may be quashed.

Keeping in mind the settlement arrived at between the parties and thatmarriage between the petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2 has already beendissolved, no fruitful purpose would be served to keep the criminalproceedings pending.Accordingly, FIR No.1052/2014 under Sections498-A/406 IPC registered at Police Station Begumpur and the consequentproceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

Petition is disposed of in the above terms.Miscellaneous applicationis disposed of as infructuous. Dasti.

JANUARY 19, 2018

r.bararia

A.K. PATHAK, J.