NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph — Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

CRL.M.C./3482/2018 of POOJA MEHTA Vs THE STATE & ANR

Court
Delhi High Court
Decision date
2018-08-29
Case number
3482/2018

Parties

Cites (0 resolved of 1 detected)

1 case citation detected in this judgment's own text, but none resolved to a judgment page in this build yet.

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+CRL.M.C. 3482/2018 & Crl.M.A. 12635/2018POOJA MEHTA

..... PetitionerThrough:Mr. Rajat Aneja & Ms. ChandrikaGupta, Advs.

versus

THE STATE & ANR

..... RespondentsThrough:Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the StateW/SI Jaspreet , PS Rajinder Nagar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBAO R R%16.07.2018

The petitioner is the author of the complaint leading to the registrationof FIR No. 175/2017 statedly involving offences punishable under Sections498A/354/406/34 IPC by police station Rajiinder Nagar.It is stated, thecomplaint leading to the registration of the said FIR was lodged in October,2016. The petitioner was married to the son of the second respondent on15.10.2010. It is stated at the bar by the counsel for the petitioner that theallegations attributing acts of commission and omission to the secondrespondent constituting offence under Section 354 IPC occurred in 2012 inU.K. where the petitioner with her husband were living at the relevant pointof time.No complaint by the petitioner qua the conduct of the secondrespondent constituting such offence was lodged with any authority till2016.

CRL.M.C. 3482/2018page 1 of 2

In these circumstances, the view taken by the learned Sessions Judgein granting bail to the second respondent by order dated 21.04.2018 to whichexception is taken by the petition at hand cannot be said to be perverse,erroneous or illegal.

The petition seeking withdrawal of the bail order, therefore, isdismissed. This rendered the application for exemption infructuous, it beingdisposed of accordingly.

R.K.GAUBA, J

JULY 16, 2018nk

CRL.M.C. 3482/2018