NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph โ€” Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

CRL.M.C./3576/2018 of RAKESH KUMAR Vs THE STATE & ANR.

Court
Delhi High Court
Decision date
2018-10-12
Case number
3576/2018

Parties

Cites (1)

Statutes cited (1)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+CRL.M.C. 3576/2018RAKESH KUMAR..... Petitioner

..... Petitioner

ThroughMr. Siddhartha Nanwal, Adv

versus

THE STATE & ANR...... Respondents

ThroughDr. M.P. Singh, APP for StateSI Devender, PS DabriRespondent no.2 in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAKO R R%12.10.2018

Notice. Learned APP accepts notice for respondent no.1.Respondent no.2-Rakhi is present in Court and accepts notice. She hasbeen identified by SI Devender of police station Dabri.

It is submitted that petitioner is elder brother-in-law ofrespondent no.2 and with the intervention of elders in the family,petitioner and respondent no.2 have settled their disputes amicablyvide Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) dated 4[th]December,2017.

Respondent no.2 admits that she has settled the matter with thepetitioner of her own free will and without any undue force, pressureor coercion in terms of MOU and that she has no objection in caseFIR No.1042/2015 under sections 451/354(A)/506 IPC registered atpolice station Dabri and the consequent proceedings are quashedagainst the petitioner.

Keeping in mind the settlement arrived at between petitionerand respondent no. 2 voluntarily, in my view, no fruitful purposewouldbeservedtokeepthecriminalproceedingspending.Accordingly, in the interest of justice, aforesaid FIR and theconsequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed against thepetitioner.

Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti.

OCTOBER 12, 2018sm

A.K. PATHAK, J